A sincere thanks to the hundreds of Guelph families who have been reaching out to me on this issue since June. I’m having informative and supportive conversations on a daily basis with residents who are sharing their stories with me and are motivated to help bring some reasonableness to the driveway issue in our City.
Many have been asking how they can help, so here’s goes…..
On Monday July 23rd Council will take the initial vote on the motion. It’s largely an administrative vote (no debate) but it is essential to getting the issue of a Driveway Width Bylaw Review onto our September council agenda. If the vote fails on Monday, the agenda item does not move forward. It’s that simple. If the vote passes however, the motion then proceeds to the September meeting where council will hear from the public, debate the motion and ultimately rule on the recommendation.
That’s why I need your support this weekend. If you haven’t already done so, please consider emailing your Ward councillors expressing your support for the motion. Please be civil, diplomatic and reasoned. I’ve been so impressed with the level of decorum shown by our community throughout this process, and I’d be even more proud if we kept it that way.
Councilors email addresses are found here https://guelph.ca/city-hall/mayor-and-council/city-council/
Thank you for your support.
One of the reasons I continue to champion the concept of Net Zero emissions for our community by 2050 is the “all above the above” energy and environment strategy that it encompasses. An approach that doesn’t just fix us on certain technologies, but allows a broader conversation that incorporates ecosystem services in our pursuit of Net Zero.
To this point, on Tuesday July 3rd Council received an update on the development of our City’s Natural Heritage Action Plan (NHAP) from staff. During discussions I drew connections between our NHAP and our 2050 Net Zero target. Below is a short video highlighting the conversation.
Thanks to all who have contributed to the NHAP to this point and I encourage all those with an interest in energy and the environment to join the conversation.
To learn more about the NHAP you can follow this link and get involved.
Thank you to the hundreds of families and residents who have reached out to me on this file. The support has been overwhelming and we are just getting started.
As you may already know, on Monday June 25th, I introduced the following Notice of Motion to Council calling for the review of our current driveway widths bylaw and pausing of enforcement.
This important procedural step now sets council on a decision pathway over the summer. A pathway that will (hopefully) bring some relief to residents over this issue. The process is as follows.
As always, please feel free to share this update with others and remind them to sign up here to stay informed.
See CTV News Coverage here.
Thank you for your support!
It’s no secret, Guelph’s original Ward Neighborhood is undergoing a renaissance in redevelopment interest. From the Metalworks redevelopment at 5 Arthur, to the redevelopment of the Chemtura Property at 120 Huron Street, the Biltmore Hats property on York Road, the potential redevelopment of the W.C. Wood facility on Duke Street and finally, the reclamation and redevelopment of the IMICO lands at 200 Beverley.
But with this investment comes change. More homes, more residents and more demands on our parking and transportation systems. That’s why I believe now (more than ever) is the time for forward thinking planning in the Ward. Specifally, thinking and planning on creating a more integrated transportation strategy specific to the neighborhood, that supports families and provides options for all forms of transportation.
Along these lines see below a geographic look at these redevelopment sites and their proximity to a potential trail corridor along the existing Guelph Junction Railway line (see photos below). This is a concept that I have begun to engage staff on as the city begins public consultation on updating the Guelph’s Trails Master Plan.
Special thanks to the Guelph Coalition for Active Transportation (GCAT) for providing the map image and their early engagement and support on this exciting file.
I’d love to hear your thoughts Guelph.
(Photo Courtesy: City of Guelph, 2018)
Just over a week ago Mayor Guthrie and myself, along with Councillor Bell, held a town-hall meeting about a city bylaw from 1995 that has created major conflicts in our community.
To recap, many citizens have been warned through compliance letters, or received summons and ultimately heavy financial penalties for widening their driveways so they can park their car on their own property. Continue reading
Thank you once again for taking time out of your busy schedules to join us on June 6th to discuss Bylaw enforcement of driveway widths in our neighborhoods.
I, along with the mayor, greatly appreciated the community’s honesty and respectful dialogue as we look to bring change to this punative issue.
As an immediate follow up to actions I took on June 6th, I’d like to provide the following update from staff to those property owners who received notices in late April.
I trust this provides some small relief to those effected homeowners in the short term. In the long term however, the Mayor and I are finalizing (this week) a Notice of Motion to Council seeking to change this bylaw permanently.
Thanks again for your patience and input on this issue. Our Townhall on June 6th was exactly what was necessary to bring people together, share our collective experiences and start the process of change.
Look for another update from me in the very near future.
At the March 5th Committee of the Whole meeting the term “free” 2hr on-street parking in the downtown was used a lot.
Specifically, whether Guelph should keep “free” 2 hr on-street parking in the future, or whether the City should implement new on-street parking fees to help fund the approved Parking Master Plan (2016). There was only one problem with this debate. It was based on the false premise that 2 hr on-street parking is actually “free” when in fact it is not. On-street parking is not free. The truth is, it is subsidized by the city’s tax budget. See below.
As noted, the current cost to operate and maintain our parking inventory downtown is funded 48% by the general tax base and 52% by parking fees (daily and monthly permits). This breaks down as $1.5M annually coming from our City budget or approximately $23/household.
It is true that the approved Parking Master Plan will result in millions of dollars of new investment in parking inventory downtown over the next decade. It is also true however, that it needs to be paid for. To this end, the collective “we” have a few options.
Option #1 | Static parking fees and continued “free” on-street parking. This option would increase the subsidization through taxes to 65%. Or $4.04M annually. This represents an annual increase of $2.54M to the city’s budget and a $61/year cost to the average homeowner (nearly triple the current $23/year).
Option #2 | Maintain “free” on-street parking and increase daily and monthly fees. This option would increase the subsidization through taxes to 51%. Or $3.2M annually. This represents an annual increase of $1.7M/year to the city’s budget and a $48/year cost to the average homeowner (double the current $23/year).
Option #3 | Blended increases to the tax subsidy and user fees. The tax base subsidy still increases by almost $400k/year with the net subsidy rate (as a percentage) being reduced to 29%. This represents a $29/year annual cost to homeowners (up from the current $23/year), with the remaining funding coming through a mix of user fees (i.e. Daily/Monthly parking passes as well as paid on-street parking). This is the enterprise model council understood in 2016 when approving the Parking Master Plan. A plan which will be jeopardized if not funded properly.
In closing, it’s very important for residents to remember that our downtown is growing…..and it is growing fast. By 2031 it is estmated that our downtown will be home to over 8,000 residents and over 8,000 jobs. This represents an increase of over 30%, making downtown one of the fastest growing and most important economic engines of our City. In order to meet these goals however, we must move towards an intensified parking system; and that system comes at a cost.
As I mentioned on Monday. It can come from the tax base. It can come from user fees. It can come from a mix of both. But it has to come from somewhere. Because one thing is for certain.
It is not “free”.
Ward 1 City Councilor
Please find attached the presentation provided at the IMICO community meeting hosted by ARQi R&D Inc., and supported by Business Development and Enterprise on January 23rd at 7:00 pm at the Italian Canadian Club.
Similar to the redevelopment of 5 Arthur Street, ARQi wished to engage the neighbourhood in preparation of an Urban Design Master Plan for the property.